Reinventing the wheel

Partnership in early drug development

June 2013

NICE final OK for B-I's Pradaxa

UK News | March 15, 2012
Bookmark and Share


Lynne Taylor

NICE final OK for B-I's Pradaxa

Final guidance from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends Boehringer Ingelheim's Pradaxa (dabigatran) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF).

The guidance - whose publication follows the dismissal on all points of an appeal against the draft version - also recommends that the decision about whether to start treatment with Pradaxa should be made after an informed discussion about its risks and benefits compared with warfarin, and in light of the person's current level of international normalised ratio (INR) control if they are already taking warfarin.

"Atrial fibrillation can be a distressing condition and people with it have an increased risk of suffering a stroke," said Professor Carole Longson, director of NICE's health technology evaluation centre. "Many people with the condition find it difficult to comply with the most commonly-used antithrombotic, warfarin, because among other things, it requires regular INR monitoring and dose adjustments, which can cause disruption and inconvenience. Because dabigatran does not require frequent blood tests to monitor treatment, it represents a useful alternative option for people with atrial fibrillation," she added.

Prof Longson also reported that NICE's independent appraisal committee had accepted evidence from clinical trials that showed Pradaxa 150mg twice daily to be more clinically effective than warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke for systemic embolism, and that at 110mg twice daily is it as effective as warfarin.

Boehringer Ingelheim points out than an estimated 1.2 million in the UK are diagnosed with AF, of whom 77% are eligible for treatment with an anticoagulant. The use of Pradaxa 150mg twice daily has the potential to prevent 530 more strokes per 100,000 patients every year compared to warfarin, the current standard of care and, if all eligible patients were to receive Pradaxa 150mg twice daily instead of warfarin, this could mean preventing up to 5,000 strokes, saving the NHS as much as £59 million in the first year, the firm adds.

Many patients and doctors will welcome NICE's recommendation, commented Martin Cowie, professor of cardiology at the Royal Brompton Hospital. "The NHS needs to act to optimise the diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation, a very common reason for strokes in the UK," he said adding: "we have waiting for more than 50 years for an alternative to warfarin, and I am delighted that at last we have another option to offer to patients who might benefit.”

The guidance marks a positive step forward for AF patients whose risk of stroke is not being appropriately managed, added Peter Rowe, recently retired Primary Care Trust (PCT) chief executive and national Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) lead for medicines use and procurement at the Department of Health.

"I would urge NHS colleagues to work in partnership with Boehringer-Ingelheim to ensure patients get appropriate and early access to the medicine and that both patient and system benefits are realised," he said.

Charles De Wet, medical director at Boehringer-Ingelheim, said the firm's "commitment now is to work closely with the Trusts to ensure dabigatran is accessible to all eligible patients on the NHS and appropriately prescribed by clinicians."

Click here to order a reprint of this news story.

Tags

Your Comments

Comments 4

  1. Elaine Donnelly 11 Jun

    I was transferred from warfarin to pradaxa 150 mg bd 6 weeks ago and I felt the benefits immediately. The side effects of warfarin were awful and held me back in my recovery from an ischemic stroke in 2010. I was constantly fatigued, felt nauseous and I'll most of the time, had hot flashes, sore toes and my INR was all over the place. Within a week of stopping warfarin I felt as if someone had given me my life back. I have energy, I am sleeping well, I have lost weight and despite the consequences of the stroke I feel really well. So thank you Pradaxa all I need now for complete peace of mind is to know the affects can be reversed in the case of a bleed but feeling this well I am happy to live with the risks as life on warfarin was no life at all.
  2. Amina Yoxall 06 Aug

    Unfortunately the health care trust responsible for this backwater (Cambridge) does not want patients to have it, so getting a letter from the local hospital (Addenbrookes) suggesting I get it from my GP was not very helpful.  Due to a series of administrative blunders it is already four months since I was discharged and they haven't even got the warfarin sorted yet.  It's like walking in glue.  Hopefully I'll survive long enough to see some progress.
  3. Sarah 05 Sep

    This backwater in Oxford is just the same, we are trying hard to get Pradaxa prescribed for my husband but GP very reluctant and just wants to issue Warfarin. My husband is on 48 with AF and a busy man running his own business - the INR testing would be an absolute inconvenience beyond belief.  We keep trying in the hope that a stroke doesn't occur before it is sorted, walking on egg shells!!
  4. Douglas 28 Dec

    I have been diagnosed with AF and also Hypertension. I am 74 and otherwise fit and healthy. I lead an active life and am just about to be put on Warfarin. It seems to me that my active lifestyle may be inhibited more by warfarin than by Pradaxa. Anyone like to comment?
    Douglas

Post a comment

  1. Formatting options
       
     
     
     
     
       

The views expressed in the following comments are not those of PharmaTimes or any connected third party and belong specifically to the individual who made that comment. We accept no liability for the comments made and always advise users to exercise caution.

JobSearch


Head-to-Head Video

 

Website Search


Search News Search Magazine