Where next for data transparency?

May 2013

J&J settles Risperdal male breasts case on first day

World News | September 11, 2012
Bookmark and Share


Selina McKee

J&J settles Risperdal male breasts case on first day

US drug giant Johnson & Johnson has reportedly settled the first of a stream of looming lawsuits claiming that its antipsychotic Risperdal caused the growth of breast tissue in males.

The suit, which was due to have its first day in a Philadelphia court yesterday, is the first of about 130 cases that allege the use of Risperdal led to the occurrence of gynecomastia - the abnormal development of large mammary glands in males, and that there were no warnings over this potential side effect on the product's label.

The plaintiff, 21-year-old Aaron Banks, alleged that he suffered psychological trauma after growing breasts while taking the drug over a four-year period when he was nine years old, at which time it was not approved for use in children in the US.

The size of the 'breasts' was allegedly to such an extent that Banks needed surgery to remove fatty tissue via suctioning, according to The Philadelphia Inquirer.

The publication claims that the financial settlement, the terms of which remain under wraps, came just as the judge was deciding whether J&J chief executive Alex Gorsky should be called to the stand to testify in the case.

Human cost

Commenting on the suit, Bob Hilliard, one of Banks’s lawyers, told Bloomberg: “The billions J&J made had a terrible human cost. This drug caused female breasts to grow on little boys around the country. Their childhoods were stolen, but billions were made".

All eyes will now be on the second case in Philadelphia, which is reportedly set to kick off on September 20.

J&J is certainly taking a bit of a battering over one-time blockbuster Risperdal. 

Last month, the firm's Janssen unit agreed to pay out $181 million to settle claims in 36 US states regarding illegal marketing practices for the drug, though it was stressed that the move was in no way an admission of wrongdoing, and various other cases are ongoing.


Click here to order a reprint of this news story.

Tags

Your Comments

Comments 2

  1. baz 11 Sep

    shoudn't the doctor who prescribed Risperdal off label be held accountable?
  2. Benjamin Livingston 20 Oct

    I agree absolutely  all doctors will be held accountable. They are legally authorized by AMA to prescribe antipsychotic mediactions. It is all about money which is basically their main concern. Their expertise deceives many Americans into that "hole". Since no man knows the human mind, no man has the right to alter anyone elses thinking with medication. Let God test the mind He made it. If not, why not try an alternative besides medication? They're just small children.The doctors will be held accountable by no doubt at all in my courtroom for any side effects...medical malpractice? Who is held accountable but the doctor who prescribed the medication? Doctors need to accept accountabilty. When patients experience such effects such as this to this extent, and being a young child to add, doctors are the only ones to prescribe the medication that caused the side effect. To show respect, doctors need to face it. stop "Passing The Buck" and "Pay-Up" for damages from the side effects their patients experienced when he or she prescribed the mediaction to that patient.

Post a comment

  1. Formatting options
       
     
     
     
     
       

The views expressed in the following comments are not those of PharmaTimes or any connected third party and belong specifically to the individual who made that comment. We accept no liability for the comments made and always advise users to exercise caution.

JobSearch


Head-to-Head Video

 

Website Search


Search News Search Magazine