Where next for data transparency?

May 2013

CRACK IT scheme offers new incentives to cut animal research reliance

Clinical News | September 20, 2011
Bookmark and Share


Peter Mansell

CRACK IT scheme offers new incentives to cut animal research reliance

A new ‘Dragon’s Den’-style funding scheme launched by the UK’s NC3Rs is offering public- and private-sector researchers grants totalling £4.25 million from industrial sponsors to find solutions that will contribute to the replacement, refinement and reduction of animal research in the life sciences.

The National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) has worked with pharmaceutical and other sponsors including AstraZeneca, Roche and Eli Lilly to come up with six initial CRACK IT challenges, spanning research areas such as developing in vitro human-cell based models, novel non-invasive measurement techniques and whole-system in vitro testing.

The CRACK IT scheme also includes a web-based research engine for problem-solving and idea-sharing between small companies, academic researchers and industry. A CRACK IT website at www.crackit.org.uk went live on 20 September.

Panel meeting

The CRACK IT Challenges competition is open to any organisations from the public or private sectors. Proposers of shortlisted projects will be invited to present their ideas at a ‘Dragons’ Den’ panel meeting and the successful bids will be announced early in 2012.

Each contract will be worth between £500,000 and £1 million, while the sponsoring company/companies will provide in-kind support. One example of a Challenge, set by AstraZeneca, involves developing a way of measuring activity and temperature in laboratory rodents housed in a group that does not involve surgery.

As well as improving animal welfare, this would enable the additional measurements to be incorporated into other studies already carried out as part of drug development, reducing the number of animals used, the NC3Rs pointed out.

A full description of each CRACK IT Challenge can be found at http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=1520. The sponsoring companies in the initial phase are AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly. Huntingdon Life Sciences, Janssen, Roche, Syngenta, UCB and Unilever.
 

Click here to order a reprint of this news story.

Tags

Your Comments

Comments 1

  1. Ward Star 20 Sep

    Many prominent scientists, supported by a vast amount of research, doubt the value of animal testing.



    Many of the alleged advances in medical science using animal testing were failures and ended up being harmful to humans even though they were not harmful to animals.

    In fact, in a USDA press release January 12, 2006, Health & Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt said:

    "Currently, nine out of ten experimental drugs fail in clinical studies because we cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies."

    But there is a simpler argument that testing is either morally or scientifically dubious: The animals must be a great deal like us for the results to be scientifically unproblematic, but very different from us in order to be morally unproblematic. When we want scientifically useful results, the more like us they are, the better. When we want clear consciences over causing disease, suffering, and death to innocent creatures, the more like us the animals are, the worse.

    We cannot have it both ways?

Post a comment

  1. Formatting options
       
     
     
     
     
       

The views expressed in the following comments are not those of PharmaTimes or any connected third party and belong specifically to the individual who made that comment. We accept no liability for the comments made and always advise users to exercise caution.

JobSearch


Head-to-Head Video

 

Website Search


Search News Search Magazine